The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 20
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte CLAUDE GOODMAN, ALAN LYON
and DANIEL WILDERMUTH
____________
Appeal No. 2001-0769
Application No. 09/237,791
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before PAK, WALTZ, and DELMENDO, Administrative Patent Judges.
PAK, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s final rejection of
claims 30 through 39 and 41, which are all of the claims pending in the above-identified application.
APPEALED SUBJECT MATTER
Claim 30 is representative of the subject matter on appeal and reads as follows:
30. A process for forming an anisotropic, auto-collimating imaging screen using vapor
deposition techniques, which comprises:
a) positioning an imaging screen substrate on a substrate fixture;
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007