Appeal No. 2001-0867
Application 09/016,571
The following rejections are on appeal before us:
1. Claims 1-3, 6-11, 14, 15, 17-21, 23 and 25-27 stand
rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over the
teachings of Li in view of the admitted prior art.
2. Claim 28 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
being unpatentable over the teachings of Li in view of the
admitted prior art and further in view of Schuster.
3. Claims 13 and 16 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103
as being unpatentable over the teachings of Li in view of the
admitted prior art and Schuster and further in view of
Pennebaker.
4. Claims 4, 18, 22 and 24 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103 as being unpatentable over the teachings of Li in view of
the admitted prior art and further in view of Ramchandran.
5. Claim 12 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
being unpatentable over the teachings of Li in view of the
admitted prior art and further in view of Copperi.
A rejection of claims 20-28 under the first paragraph of 35
U.S.C. § 112 has been withdrawn by the examiner [answer, page
14].
-3-
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007