Appeal No. 2001-0906
Application No. 08/597,073
“although Hutcheson ‘059 mentions the use of Doppler compensation per se, Hutcheson ‘059 does
not teach or suggest locating a terminal using relative powers and a model of spot beam shape and
using said location of said terminal to determine a Doppler compensation.” We agree. Thus, the
obviousness rejection of claims 9 through 12, 14 and 21 through 26 is reversed.
DECISION
The decision of the examiner rejecting claims 1 through 7, 9 through 12, 14, 16 through 19
and 21 through 29 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) is reversed.
REVERSED
5
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007