Ex Parte AMEEN et al - Page 4




          Appeal No. 2001-1068                                                        
          Application 09/063,196                                                      



                    Claims 8, 9 and 12 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.                 
          § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Mizuno in view of Miyamoto              
          and Foster.                                                                 
                    Claims 10, 13 and 14 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.               
          § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Mizuno in view of Miyamoto,             
          Eichman and Foster.                                                         
                    Claims 15 through 17 and 20 through 23 stand rejected             
          under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Eichman in              
          view of Foster and Albrecht.                                                
                    Claims 18, 19 and 31 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.               
          § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Eichman in view of Foster,              
          Albrecht, Shufflebotham and Miyamoto.                                       
                    Claim 301 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as             
          being unpatentable over Mizuno in view of Wolf.                             
                    Reference is made to the briefs (paper numbers 14 and             
          17) and the answer (paper number 15) for the respective positions           
          of the appellants and the examiner.                                         






          1 Since claim 30 depends from claim 29, the rejection of                    
          claim 30 must of necessity include Miyamoto.                                
                                          4                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007