Ex Parte BUYNOSKI - Page 1




          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                  
          was not written for publication and is not binding precedent                
          of the Board.                                                               

                                                            Paper No. 22              



                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                     __________                                       
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                     __________                                       
                            Ex parte MATTHEW S. BUYNOSKI                              
                                     __________                                       
                                Appeal No. 2001-1093                                  
                               Application 09/252,186                                 
                                     __________                                       
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                     __________                                       

          Before HAIRSTON, RUGGIERO, and DIXON, Administrative Patent                 
          Judges.                                                                     
          HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.                                      

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   

               This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1                 
          through 10 and 21 through 33.  In a first Amendment After Final             
          (paper number 12), claim 28 was amended, and claims 32 and 33               
          were canceled.  Accordingly, claims 1 through 10 and 21 through             
          31 remain before us on appeal.                                              

                                          1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007