Ex Parte PARESCHI et al - Page 1




           The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not         
            written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.        

                                                            Paper No. 15              


                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                    _____________                                     
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                    _____________                                     
                              Ex parte REMO PARESCHI,                                 
                                 NATALIE S. GLANCE,                                   
                                  DANIELE PAGANI,                                     
                                JEAN-MARC ANDREOLI,                                   
                                STEFANIA CASTELLANI,                                  
                                        and                                           
                                    GUNNAR TEEGE                                      
                                    _____________                                     
                                Appeal No. 2001-1204                                  
                             Application No. 08/971,021                               
                                   ______________                                     
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                   _______________                                    

          Before HAIRSTON, FLEMING, and SAADAT, Administrative Patent                 
          Judges.                                                                     
          HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.                                      

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims                   
          1 through 3, 5, 6, 8 through 11, 13 through 16, 18 and 20.                  
               The disclosed invention relates to a method and apparatus              
          for generating a representation of a work process in a memory of            
          a data processing system.                                                   






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007