Ex Parte CHOI - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2001-1208                                                        
          Application No. 09/057,585                                                  


               The disclosed invention relates to optics for a reflection-            
          type projector.                                                             
               Claim 1 is illustrative of the claimed invention, and it               
          reads as follows:                                                           
               1. A reflection type projector comprising:                             
               a light source for emitting an input light;                            
               only one image forming unit having a plurality of pixels in            
          a two-dimensional array structure, each of the plurality of                 
          pixels being independently driven, for forming and reflecting an            
          image from the input light;                                                 
               a critical angle prism having a transmission/reflection                
          surface disposed along an optical path of the input light, the              
          transmission/reflection surface transmitting the input light from           
          the light source to the image forming unit, and reflecting light            
          that re-enters the critical angle prism from the image forming              
          unit; and                                                                   
               a projection lens unit for enlarging and transmitting the              
          light reflected from the transmission/reflection surface of the             
          critical angle prism.                                                       
               The references relied on by the examiner are:                          
          van den Brandt                4,969,730           Nov. 13, 1990             
          (van den Brandt ‘730)                                                       
          van den Brandt et al.         5,098,184           Mar. 24, 1992             
          (van den Brandt ‘184)                                                       
          Burstyn                       5,309,188           May   3, 1994             
          Poradish et. (Poradish)       5,612,753           Mar. 18, 1997             
          Levis et al. (Levis)          5,829,858           Nov.  3, 1998             
                                                 (filed Mar. 31, 1997)               
               Claim 1 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being              
          anticipated by Burstyn.                                                     

                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007