The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 16
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte IGOR ALEXEFF
____________
Appeal No. 2001-1344
Application No. 09/218,763
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before RUGGIERO, DIXON, and GROSS, Administrative Patent Judges.
RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on the appeal from the final rejection of
claims 1, 2, 4-9, 11, 13-19, and 21-24, which are all of the claims
pending in the present application. Claim 3, 10, 12, and 20 have
been canceled.
The claimed invention relates to an image viewing device
having a member with an aperture that permits light rays from the
image to enter through the aperture. Further included is an
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007