Appeal No. 2001-1362
Application No. 08/670,684
al., and Danforth would not result in the existence of a local method table with local dispatch
information and a remote method table with remote dispatch information.”
Based upon the foregoing, the rejection of claims 1 through 7, 23 through 29 and 42 through
44 is reversed because of the lack of a prima facie case of obviousness.
DECISION
The decision of the examiner rejecting claims 1 through 7, 23 through 29 and 42 through 44
under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) is reversed.
REVERSED
JAMES D. THOMAS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
KENNETH W. HAIRSTON ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
MICHAEL R. FLEMING )
Administrative Patent Judge )
KWH/lp
5
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007