Ex Parte KUNDU et al - Page 5




            Appeal No.2001-1715                                                                               
            Application No. 08/730,892                                                                        

            apply to agents capable of initiating the blood coagulation.  The mere fact that the prior art    
            could be modified as proposed by the Examiner is not sufficient to establish a prima facie        
            case of obviousness.  See In re Fritch, 972 F.2d 1260, 1266, 23 USPQ2d 1780, 1783 (Fed.           
            Cir. 1992).                                                                                       
                   Since we reverse for the lack of the presentation of a prima facie case of obviousness     
            by the Examiner, we need not reach the issue of the sufficiency of the evidence as allegedly      
            demonstrating unexpected results.   See In re Geiger, 815 F.2d 686, 688, 2 USPQ2d 1276,           
            1278 (Fed. Cir. 1987).                                                                            




















                                                      5                                                       




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007