The opinion in support of the decision entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 26
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte RAYMOND ROBERT HORTON, ISMAIL CEVDET NOYAN,
MICHAEL JON PALMER and WILLIAM EDWARD PENCE IV
____________
Appeal No. 2001-1771
Application No. 09/205,782
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before ABRAMS, FRANKFORT, and STAAB, Administrative Patent Judges.
STAAB, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 22, 23,
26 and 28-35, all the claims currently pending in the application. The amendment filed on
April 21, 2000 (Paper No. 14) subsequent to the most recent final rejection has not been
entered.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007