Ex Parte CORBIN - Page 5




          Appeal No. 2001-1815                                                        
          Application 08/924,865                                                      


               said camera positioning system comprising:                             
               means for adjusting said camera’s angle of view,                       
               means for adjusting said camera’s line of sight, said                  
          camera’s line of sight being limited at a predetermined stop, and           
               means for determining said predetermined stop, said                    
          predetermined stop being determined in dependence upon said angle           
          of view,                                                                    
               such that at said predetermined stop, said perimeter                   
          edge of said field of view coincides with said bounding edge                
          within said field of view.                                                  
                                     References                                       
               The reference relied on by the Examiner is as follows:                 
          Oyashiki et al. (Oyashiki)         5,808,670      Sept. 15, 1998            
          (Filed Sept.  6, 1995)                                                      
                                 Rejection at Issue                                   
               Claims 1 through 7 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102 as             
          being anticipated by Oyashiki.                                              
                                      OPINION                                         
               With full consideration being given to the subject matter on           
          appeal, the Examiner’s rejection and the arguments of Appellant             
          and Examiner, for the reasons stated infra, we reverse the                  
          Examiner’s rejection of claims 1 through 7 under 35 U.S.C. § 102.           





                                          5                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007