Ex Parte KOCH et al - Page 2




              Appeal No. 2001-1876                                                                                        
              Application No. 09/271,410                                                                                  

                                                    BACKGROUND                                                            
                     The invention relates to acknowledgment of receipt of messages in network                            
              protocols.  Claim 1 is reproduced below.                                                                    
                     1.     A method for acknowledgment of receipt of a message in a network, the                         
                     network including a plurality of nodes, comprising the steps of:                                     
                            (a)  sending a message from a first node of the plurality of nodes destined                   
                     for a second node of the plurality of nodes;                                                         
                            (b)  setting a timer for the first node for receipt of an acknowledgment                      
                     packet from the second node;                                                                         
                            (c)  determining if a wait acknowledge packet is received by the first node,                  
                     wherein the wait acknowledge packet notifies the first node that the message                         
                     has been sent to a next hop; and                                                                     
                            (d)  resetting the timer if the wait acknowledge packet is received by the                    
                     first node.                                                                                          
                     The examiner relies on the following references:                                                     
              Chen et al. (Chen)                  4,970,714                           Nov. 13, 1990                       
              Ohsawa                              5,519,699                           May 21, 1996                        
                     Claims 1-15 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over                          
              Chen and Ohsawa.                                                                                            
                     We refer to the Final Rejection (Paper No. 10) and the Examiner’s Answer                             
              (Paper No. 16) for a statement of the examiner's position and to the Brief (Paper No.                       
              15) and the Reply Brief (Paper No. 17) for appellants’ position with respect to the claims                  
              which stand rejected.                                                                                       



                                                           -2-                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007