Ex Parte RAMESH - Page 1




                  The opinion in support of the decision being entered                                
                  today was not written for publication in a law journal                              
                  and is not binding precedent of the Board.                                          
                                                                           Paper No. 18               


                          UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                   
                                                                                                     
                              BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                      
                                        AND INTERFERENCES                                             
                                                                                                     
                                     Ex parte RAJARAM RAMESH                                          
                                                                                                     
                                       Appeal No. 2001-2017                                           
                                   Application No. 09/098,049                                         
                                                                                                     
                                              ON BRIEF                                                
                                                                                                     

            Before KRASS, BARRETT and FLEMING, Administrative Patent Judges.                          
            KRASS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                       


                                        DECISION ON APPEAL                                            
                  This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of                            
            claims 1-3, 5-14 and 16-28.                                                               
                  The invention is directed to a mobile position computation                          
            apparatus within a region serviced by a radio communication                               
            network, best illustrated by reference to representative                                  
            independent claim 1, reproduced as follows:                                               


                                                 -1–                                                  





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007