The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 25
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte SANDOR NAGY,
RAMESH KRISHNAMURTI,
JOHN A. TYRELL,
LEONARD V. CRIBBS,
MARY COCOMAN,
and
BRADLEY P. ETHERTON
____________
Appeal No. 2001-2095
Application No. 08/872,659
ON BRIEF
Before WALTZ, LIEBERMAN, and POTEATE, Administrative Patent Judges.
LIEBERMAN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the decision of the examiner
refusing to allow claims 22 through 35, 37 through 51 and 53 through 73 which are all
the claims pending in this application.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007