Ex Parte IWASAKI - Page 12



            Appeal No. 2001-2119                                                      
            Application No. 08/826,744                                                
            the base claims.  In our view, Appellant’s arguments                      
            improperly attempt to narrow the scope of the claim by                    
            implicitly adding disclosed limitations which have no basis               
            in the claim.  See In re Morris, 127 F.3d 1048, 1054-55, 44               
            USPQ2d 1023, 1027-28 (Fed. Cir. 1997).                                    
                 In summary, we have sustained the Examiner’s 35 U.S.C.                                                                   
            § 103(a) rejection of all of the claims on appeal.                        
            Therefore, the decision of the Examiner rejecting claims 2-               
            6, 8, 9, and 12-16 is affirmed.                                           
                                                                                     
                                                                                     

                                                                                     
                                                                                     
                                                                                     









                                          12                                          




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007