Ex Parte JACH - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2001-2188                                                        
          Application No. 09/085,300                                                  


          orifice for an entire lot of sensor elements is determined by               
          correlating an optimum pump current value with the measured pump            
          current and the diameter of the intake orifice of the selected              
          sensor element.  The diffusion resistance of a diffusion barrier            
          of the sensor elements is adjusted by modifying the diameter of             
          the gas intake orifice in accordance with the determined optimum            
          gas intake orifice diameter.                                                
               Claim 7 is illustrative of the invention and reads as                  
          follows:                                                                    
                    7.  A method of calibrating sensor elements for limit             
               current probes, comprising the steps of:                               
                    (a) measuring a value of a pump current of one of the             
               sensor elements at a selected pump voltage, a gas intake               
               orifice of the one of the sensor elements having a                     
               predetermined diameter;                                                
                    (b) correlating the measured value of the pump current            
               with the predetermined diameter of the gas intake orifice              
               and an optimum pump current; and                                       
                    (c) calibrating the sensor elements as a function of              
               the correlating step, the calibrating step being performed             
               during a manufacturing process of the sensor.                          
               No prior art references have been relied upon by the                   
          Examiner.                                                                   
               As the sole rejection by the Examiner before us, claims 7-             
          10, 12, and 14-19 stand finally rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112,             
          first paragraph, as being based on an inadequate disclosure.                

                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007