The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 25
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte SATOSHI KOMOTO,
TOSHIAKI TANAKA, and NORIO FUJIMURA
____________
Appeal No. 2001-2209
Application No. 09/019,158
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before KRASS, RUGGIERO, and BARRY, Administrative Patent Judges.
RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on the appeal from the final rejection of claims 14 and 17-19. Claims 1-5,
8-13, 15 and 16 have been canceled and claims 6 and 7 stand withdrawn from consideration as
being directed to a non-elected invention. Amendments filed July 13, 2000 and July 27, 2000 after
final rejection have been approved for entry by the Examiner.
The claimed invention is directed to a semiconductor light-emitting device having at least
two parallel leads with a light-emitting chip mounted on the distal end of at least one of the leads.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007