The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not
written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 20
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte IAN CRAYFORD, RAMESH SIVAKOLUNDU
and BING CHENG
___________
Appeal No. 2001-2291
Application No. 08/743,049
__________
ON BRIEF
__________
Before KRASS, JERRY SMITH, and FLEMING, Administrative Patent
Judges.
JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from
the examiner’s rejection of claims 1 and 14 which constitute the
only claims in the application.
The disclosed invention pertains to a device for
economically and efficiently interfacing a plurality of PHY
devices integrated into a single semiconductor package with an
integrated repeater front-end device to produce a repeater.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007