Ex Parte VISSER - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2001-2403                                                        
          Application No. 08/851,040                                                  

               Representative independent claim 21 is reproduced below:               
               21. A method for presenting inventory items, comprising:               
               providing at least three stores which are separated from               
          each other by elongate walls, each wall having a doorway, with              
          the doorways being aligned with each other, wherein each store              
          has its own outside entrance;                                               
               entering into a parking facility adjacent the outside                  
          entrances;                                                                  
               selecting one of the outside entrances and entering into the           
          selected outside entrance directly from the parking facility;               
               moving to and standing in an aisle which passes through each           
          doorway;                                                                    
               looking down the aisle and visualizing at least some of the            
          interior of each store,                                                     
               selecting an item within one of the stores; and                        
               purchasing the item while within the store.                            
               Claims 21-26 and 28-36 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 101            
          as being directed to non-statutory subject matter.1                         
               Rather than reiterate the viewpoints of the Examiner and               
          Appellant regarding the above-noted rejection, we make reference            
          to the answer (Paper No. 24, mailed April 10, 2001) for the                 
          Examiner’s reasoning and the appeal brief (Paper No. 23, filed              
          February 20, 2001) for Appellant’s arguments thereagainst.                  

               1  The 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) rejection of claims 1-4, 6-16 and 18-36 as   
          being anticipated by Searcy, as stated in the final rejection (Paper No. 21,
          mailed September 25, 2000), has been withdrawn by the Examiner.             
                                          2                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007