Ex Parte IGARASHI - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2001-2530                                       Page 2           
          Application No. 09/115,250                                                  


                                     BACKGROUND                                       
               Appellant’s invention relates to a semiconductor device                
          including an MOS transistor.  An understanding of the invention             
          can be derived from a reading of exemplary claim 16, which is               
          reproduced below.                                                           
                    16.  A semiconductor device including a MOS transistor            
               comprising:                                                            
                    a semiconductor substrate;                                        
                    a gate insulating film on said semiconductor substrate;           
                    a gate electrode in which an amorphous layer having a             
               grain size of 0.05 µm or less is formed along the surface of           
               or inside said gate electrode and/or along the side surfaces           
               of said gate electrode; and                                            
                    a conductor region which is formed in said                        
               semiconductor substrate by ion implantation after formation            
               of said amorphous layer.                                               

               The sole prior art reference of record applied by the                  
          examiner in rejecting the appealed claims is:                               
          Saida et al. (Saida)          5,866,930           Feb. 02, 1999             
                                                  (filed Aug. 23. 1996)               
               In addition, the examiner refers to the following references           
          in responding to appellant’s arguments:                                     
          Hseih                         4,688,078           Aug. 18, 1987             
          Matsukawa et al. (Matsukawa) 5,172,196            Dec. 15, 1992             
          Jain et al. (Jain)            5,290,727           Mar. 01, 1994             
          Sandhu et al. (Sandhu)        5,506,166           Apr. 09, 1996             









Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007