The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for
publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 24
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte ALLAN P. THOMPSON
and JOHN K. SHIGLEY
____________
Appeal No. 2002-0038
Application No. 09/090,256
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before KRATZ, TIMM and DELMENDO, Administrative Patent Judges.
KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's refusal to
allow claims 6-11, 14-22, 24-27, 29, 31 and 33-36. Claims 12,
23, 28, 30, 37 and 38, which are all of the other claims that
remain pending in this application, have been indicated as
containing allowable subject matter by the examiner but have been
objected to as depending from a rejected base claim. See page 2
of the answer.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007