Ex Parte INO et al - Page 3




         Appeal No. 2002-0128                                                       
         Application No. 08/878,588                                                 


              integratedly forming thin film transistors, each                      
              transistor including the semiconducting thin film as an               
              active layer, with a specific arrangement pitch in the                
              lateral direction;                                                    
              wherein said laser annealing step further comprises a                 
              step of moving the laser beam relative to the insulating              
              substrate in the lateral direction with a specific movement           
              pitch to form a partially overlapping region between                  
              adjacent region irradiated with the laser beam, the movement          
              pitch between pulses of the laser beam being set at a value           
              equal to an arrangement pitch of the active layer of the              
              thin film transistors or at a value larger by a factor of an          
              integer than the arrangement pitch of the active layer of             
              the thin film transistors and positioning the substrate               
              before the annealing step so that the overlapping region              
              will be between the active layers of the thin film                    
              transistors.                                                          
              The Examiner relies on the following prior art:                       
         Chae                     5,432,122                Jul. 11, 1995            
              Claims 1-6 and 17-22, all of the pending claims, stand                
         finally rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable            
         over Chae.                                                                 
              Rather than reiterate the arguments of Appellants and the             
         Examiner, reference is made to the Briefs1 and Answer for their            
         respective details.                                                        



         1 The Appeal Brief was filed March 12, 2001 (Paper No. 18).  In response to
         the Examiner’s Answer dated May 18, 2001 (Paper No. 19), a Reply Brief was 
         filed July 23, 2001 (Paper No. 21), which was acknowledged and entered by the
         Examiner as indicated in the communication dated July 27, 2001 (Paper No. 22).
                                         3                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007