Ex Parte SAWADA et al - Page 1




            The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not        
            written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.        
                                                            Paper No. 22              

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                    _____________                                     
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                    _____________                                     
                               Ex parte HIROKI SAWADA,                                
                                TAKAYUKI KITANO, and                                  
                                    MANABU NAKAI                                      
                                   _____________                                      
                                Appeal No. 2002-0183                                  
                             Application No. 09/379,570                               
                                   ______________                                     
                              HEARD: December 10, 2002                                
                                   _______________                                    

          Before KIMLIN, PAK, and LIEBERMAN, Administrative Patent Judges.            
          KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.                                        

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   


               This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1-9.              
          Claim 10, the other claim remaining in the present application,             
          stands withdrawn from consideration.                                        
               A copy of illustrative claim 1 is appended to this decision.           
               The examiner relies upon the following references as                   
          evidence of obviousness:                                                    









Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007