Ex Parte CULLEN et al - Page 4




          Appeal No. 2002-0195                                                        
          Application No. 09/174,977                                                  


               B.  The Sealed Container Claim 30                                      
               Appealed claim 30 is written in a Jepson-type format and               
          requires a sealed container, a product which may be deleteriously           
          affected by oxygen, an atmosphere which contains oxygen and carbon          
          dioxide as a result of a carbon dioxide flush, and as the                   
          improvement a stable composition of at least five specific                  
          ingredients (see the claim construction for claim 30, of similar            
          scope, on pages 8-9 of the decision in Appeal No. 1995-3770, Paper          
          No. 27).                                                                    
               The examiner finds that Nakamura discloses a sealed container          
          for preserving foods in the presence of a composition containing            
          five ingredients within the scope of claim 30 on appeal (Answer,            
          page 2).  Although the examiner finds that Nakamura teaches broad           
          ranges for each ingredient and fails to teach the water content of          
          the water adsorbent, the examiner concludes that it would have been         
          well within the ordinary skill in the art to select amounts within          
          the broad ranges of Nakamura “to optimize the properties” and to            
          start with a dry water adsorbent since the reference teaches that           
          the package should be kept dry (Answer, paragraph bridging pages 2-         
          3).                                                                         
               We determine that the examiner has failed to address the               
          limitations of claim 30 as discussed above and as construed in our          

                                          4                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007