The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not
written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 17
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte THIERRY BERLUREAU
and
JEAN-LOUIS LISKA
__________
Appeal No. 2002-0262
Application No. 09/127,785
___________
ON BRIEF
___________
Before GARRIS, OWENS, and MOORE, Administrative Patent Judges.
MOORE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final
rejection of claims 1-8, which are all of the claims pending in
this appeal.
REPRESENTATIVE CLAIMS
Claims 1, 2, 3 and 8 are representative, and read as follows:
1. An industrial vented cell storage battery comprising:
an electrode package including at least one positive
electrode containing nickel hydroxide, one negative electrode, and
one hydrophilic and gas-permeable separator,
1 We note that a request for oral hearing was filed 7/12/2001. As we are
convinced based upon the briefs and answer to reverse the rejection, an oral
hearing is unnecessary to reach resolution of the disputed issues.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007