Appeal No. 2002-0282
Application 09/363,407
11, a copy of which appears in “APPENDIX A” to the brief (Paper
No. 13).
As evidence of obviousness, the examiner has applied the
document specified below:
Tornier 5,358,526 Oct. 25, 1994
The following rejection is before us for review.
Claims 11 through 14 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a)
as being unpatentable over Tornier.
The full text of the examiner’s rejection and response to
the argument presented by appellants appears in the answer (Paper
No. 14), while the complete statement of appellants’ argument can
be found in the brief (Paper No. 13).
2
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007