Ex Parte PAPIERNIAK et al - Page 2




            Appeal No. 2002-0294                                                                              
            Application No. 09/067,806                                                                        


                   25. A method of arranging Internet data stored as separate                                 
                   non-correlated data record that relate to Internet data records with                       
                   individual users, comprising:                                                              
                         forming a page map;                                                                  
                         forming a user session map; and                                                      
                         forming a user session page map.                                                     
                   The examiner relies on the following references:                                           
                   Bachman et al. (Bachman)        5,907,621           May 25, 1999                           
                                                                       (filed Nov. 15, 1996)                  
                   Crosskey et al. (Crosskey)      6,035,281           Mar. 07, 2000                          
                                                                       (filed Jun. 16, 1997)                  
                   Claims 25 and 26 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. §102 (e) as anticipated by                 
            Bachman.                                                                                          
                   Claims 2-4, 27-29 and 33-37 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. §103 as                         
            unpatentable over Bachman in view of Crosskey, the rejection of claims 5 and 30-32                
            being withdrawn by the examiner.                                                                  
                   Reference is made to the briefs and answer for the respective positions of                 
            appellants and the examiner.                                                                      
                                                  OPINION                                                     
                   At the outset, we note that in accordance with appellants’ grouping of claims, at          
            page 2 of the principal brief, all claims will stand or fall together.  Accordingly, we           
            concentrate on the rejection of independent claim 25 under 35 U.S.C. §102 (e).                    

                                                      2                                                       





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007