Appeal No. 2002-0322
Application 08/681,870
Consequently, I would also affirm the examiner=s rejection of claim 9 for the reasons
stated by the examiner and above.
PETER F. KRATZ ) BOARD OF PATENT
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
) INTERFERENCES
- 13 -
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007