Ex Parte LEE et al - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2002-0431                                                        
          Application 09/309,057                                                      


                                    THE INVENTION                                     
               The appellants claim a cleaning apparatus for removing                 
          chemical substances from an inside wall of a conduit.  Claim 1 is           
          illustrative:                                                               
               1.   An apparatus for removing chemical substances deposited           
          on an inside wall of a conduit in a cleaning process comprising:            
               a movable shaft having an upper portion and a lower portion,           
               a plurality of scraping elements attached to said upper                
          portion of the shaft,                                                       
               drive means attached to said lower portion of the shaft for            
          providing both vertical and circumferential motions of said                 
          shaft,                                                                      
               a housing adapted for receiving said shaft and said                    
          plurality of scraping elements, and                                         
               a controller for controlling said cleaning process by a                
          plurality of scraping elements driven by said movable shaft to              
          scrape said chemical substances deposited on the inside wall of             
          said conduit.[1]                                                            
                                    THE REJECTION                                     
               Claims 1-17 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first                
          paragraph, enablement requirement.                                          




               1 The amendment in which this form of claim 1 was introduced           
          (amendment filed November 2, 2000, paper no. 9) has been approved           
          for entry by the examiner (advisory action mailed November 16,              
          2000, paper no. 10), but has not been clerically entered.  The              
          examiner should have this amendment entered.                                
                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007