Ex Parte SPITZ et al - Page 7




          Appeal No. 2002-0503                                       Page 7           
          Application No. 09/089,698                                                  


          Fig. 1) located below the bottom wall (12, Fig. 1) of a tank                
          holder.  The tank holder includes a cylindrical ink joint (14,              
          Fig. 1) on the upper surface of the bottom wall thereof holding a           
          disc filter (14a, Fig. 1) in the upper portion of the cylinder.             
          The examiner has not pointed to any disclosure in Oda that would            
          suggest a need for a quick and highly accurate temperature                  
          control system.  In this regard, the examiner has not established           
          that one of ordinary skill in the art would view the heat                   
          dissipating capacity of the heat sink (17, Fig. 1) of Oda as                
          requiring any correction or modification.                                   
               While the heat radiating heat sink of Watanabe has fins to             
          aid in heat dissipation, that fact, by itself, does not serve to            
          establish that one of ordinary skill in the art would have been             
          led to employ such fins in Oda’s device in a fashion so as to               
          arrive at the here claimed subject matter based on the combined             
          teachings of the references.  The mere fact that the prior art              
          may be modified to reflect features of the claimed invention does           
          not make the modification obvious unless the desirability of such           
          modification is suggested by the prior art.                                 
               Rejections based on § 103(a) must rest on a factual basis              
          with these facts being interpreted without hindsight                        
          reconstruction of the invention from the prior art.  See In re              







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007