Appeal No. 2002-0552
Application No. 09/117,603
teachings and not from any fair teaching or suggestion in the
references themselves.
In light of the foregoing, it is our determination that the
examiner has not made out a prima facie case of obviousness, and
that the decision of the examiner rejecting claim 3 under
35 U.S.C. § 103(a) must be reversed.
REVERSED
NEAL E. ABRAMS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
CHARLES E. FRANKFORT ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
JOHN P. MCQUADE )
Administrative Patent Judge )
CEF/lbg
77
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007