Ex Parte ZAPPACOSTA - Page 1




          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was              
          not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the             
          Board.                                                                      
                                                            Paper No. 15              

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                     __________                                       
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                     __________                                       
                            Ex parte ELISA E. ZAPPACOSTA                              
                                     __________                                       
                                Appeal No. 2002-0555                                  
                               Application 09/361,514                                 
                                     ___________                                      
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                     ___________                                      

          Before COHEN, FRANKFORT, and STAAB, Administrative Patent Judges.           
          FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent Judge.                                     

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   


          This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final                      
          rejection of claims 1 through 12, all of the claims pending in              
          this application. In the examiner’s answer (Paper No. 10, page              
          3), the examiner has withdrawn the rejections of claims 2 and 5             
          through 12, indicating that claims 5 through 12 now stand allowed           
          and that claim 2 is now objected to, but contains allowable                 



                                          1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007