Appeal No. 2002-0556
Application No. 09/177,960
of using a timed loop sequential display of icons in lieu of the
icon display disclosed by Steele. Appellants’ arguments concerning
hierarchy-dependent displays are not commensurate in scope with the
invention set forth in claim 1. Appellants’ arguments concerning
the two claimed fields are not convincing of the nonobviousness of
the claimed invention because nothing in claim 1 on appeal requires
that the first and second fields be concurrently displayed on the
display. In summary, the obviousness rejection of claim 1 is
sustained. The obviousness rejection of claims 2 through 10 is
likewise sustained because appellants have chosen to let all of the
claims on appeal stand or fall together (brief, page 4).
DECISION
The decision of the examiner rejecting claims 1 through 10
under 35 U.S.C. 103 is affirmed.
5
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007