Ex Parte SHORTER - Page 2




              Appeal No. 2002-0580                                                                                      
              Application No. 08/980,336                                                                                

                     Appellant's invention relates to a unique object identification in a network of                    
              computing systems.  An understanding of the invention can be derived from a reading                       
              of exemplary claim 1, which is reproduced below.                                                          
                     1.     A method of uniquely identifying an object, comprising:                                     
                                   associating a unique host identifier with a data processing                          
                     system within a plurality of data processing systems;                                              
                                   associating a unique data item identifier with an object within                      
                     a plurality of objects within the data processing system;                                          
                                   associating a unique network identifier with a network of                            
                     data processing systems within a plurality of networks of data processing                          
                     systems, wherein the network includes the data processing system                                   
                     containing the object; and                                                                         
                                   constructing a unique object identifier for the object by                            
                     combining a plurality of fields including a first field containing the data item                   
                     identifier, a second field containing the host system identifier, and a third                      
                     field containing the network identifier.                                                           
                     The prior art of record relied upon by the examiner in rejecting the appealed                      
              claims is as follows:                                                                                     
              Sidhu et al.  (Sidhu)              5,884,322                          Mar. 16, 1999                       
              Munroe et al. (Munroe)             5,581,765                          Dec. 03, 1996                       
                     Claims 1, 4-8, 11-16, 19 and 20 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being                      
              unpatentable over Sidhu in view of Munroe.                                                                






                                                           2                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007