The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not
written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 56
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte GILBERT P. HYATT
____________
Appeal No. 2002-0652
Application No. 08/465,072
____________
HEARD: October 22, 2002
____________
Before HAIRSTON,1 BARRETT, and GROSS, Administrative Patent Judges.
GROSS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 98 through 102, 104 through 108, 115, 116,
120 through 125, 131 through 141, 143 through 147, 154, 155, 161
through 164, 170, 171, 175 through 195, 204 through 206, 211
through 219, 227 through 254, 263 through 265, 273 through 278,
286 through 288, 297 through 304, 307, 310, 311, 314, 317, 320,
323, 324, 327, 330, 331, 334, 336 through 338, 341 through 346,
349, 351 through 353, 356 through 361, 364, 366 through 368, 371,
374 through 377, 379, 382, 384, 389, 390, and 392 through 395.
1 For purposes of rendering a decision herein, Administrative Patent
Judge Hairston has been substituted for Administrative Patent Judge Lall, who
has retired since the date of the hearing. See In re Bose Corp., 772 F.2d
866, 227 USPQ 1 (Fed. Cir. 1985) and MPEP § 1203. See also Paper No. 47.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007