Ex Parte ZACHARIAS et al - Page 19




         Appeal No. 2002-0741                                                       
         Application No. 08/935,348                                                 


         background section of the specification, the requirements for              
         adhesives for application to the skin are stringent.  The                  
         adhesives must                                                             
              adhere well to human skin during perspiration, when the               
              weather is hot, or in an environment of draining                      
              wounds, yet be removable without leaving adhesive                     
              residue on the skin's surface.  Moreover, adhesion                    
              should take effect immediately on application to skin,                
              even in a hot or moist environment, and should release                
              cleanly and with minimal discomfort when voluntarily                  
              removed in this environment.  [Column 1, lines 13-20.]                
              Paul also observes that “[a]dhesives applied to sensitive             
         areas of the human body require further special characteristics.           
         Hair covered regions are especially difficult to adhere well to            
         without causing pain upon removal of the adhered article” (column          
         1, lines 21-24).  Paul indicates that the adhesives disclosed              
         therein meet these objectives.  Thus, Paul’s adhesives “[are]              
         especially suited for adhesive skin application” (columns 54-55).          
              The above noted teachings of Zacharias PCT ‘238 and Paul              
         would have provided ample motivation to one of ordinary skill in           
         the art to have utilized the hot melt, pressure sensitive                  
         adhesives of Paul in the sanitary napkin article of Zacharias PCT          
         ‘238.  Appellants do not argue that the combination proposed by            
         the examiner would not have been obvious or that the resulting             
         modified Zacharias PCT ‘238 article would not correspond to the            

                                         19                                         





Page:  Previous  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007