Ex Parte DRUECKE et al - Page 1



                     The opinion in support of the decision being entered             
                           today was not written for publication and                  
                             is not binding precedent of the Board                    

                                                       Paper No. 25                   
                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                     __________                                       
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                     __________                                       
                             Ex parte FRANK G. DRUECKE,                               
                                 JAMES J. TANNER and                                  
                                   RICHARD H. BELL                                    
                                     ___________                                      
                                Appeal No. 2002-0815                                  
                             Application No. 08/902,171                               
                                     ___________                                      
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                     ___________                                      
          Before KIMLIN, KRATZ, and PAWLIKOWSKI, Administrative Patent                
          Judges.                                                                     

          PAWLIKOWSKI, Administrative Patent Judge.                                   


                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   

               This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s            
          final rejection of claims 1-11.                                             
               Claims 1-4 are representative of the subject matter on                 
          appeal, and are set forth below, wherein the text in bold is for            
          emphasis:                                                                   
               1.  A weather-protective outer garment comprising a                    
          laminated fabric of a polyolefin nonwoven fabric discontinuously            
          bonded to a foraminous polyolefin film with an adhesive, said               
          laminated fabric oriented such that the polyolefin film side of             
          the fabric is the outward-facing surface of the garment, said               
          garment having one or more discontinuously ultrasonically bonded            






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007