Appeal No. 2002-0876 Page 5
Application No. 09/267,140
above with respect to claim 1. Since the issues with respect to claim 2 are essentially
the same as the issues with respect to claim 1, we will not sustain the rejection of claim
2 for essentially the same reasons discussed above with respect to claim 1.
In summary, we have not sustained either of the examiner’s rejections of the
claims on appeal. Therefore, the decision of the examiner rejecting claims 1 and 2 is
reversed.
REVERSED
JAMES D. THOMAS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
ERROL A. KRASS ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
JERRY SMITH )
Administrative Patent Judge )
JS/yrt
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007