Ex Parte FASSLER et al - Page 6




          Appeal No. 2002-0881                                                        
          Application No. 09/169,071                                                  


               Even if Ochiai, Halko and Takahashi are properly combined in           
          the manner suggested by the examiner, the examiner has not                  
          established that such combination would result in the claimed               
          invention.  Specifically, the examiner has not referred to any              
          structure in the applied prior art references corresponding to              
          the claimed means for applying a cleaning liquid, i.e., the                 
          corresponding structure described at page 7 of the specification            
          or equivalents thereof.  In re Donaldson Co., 16 F.3d 1189, 1193,           
          29 USPQ2d 1845, 1848 (Fed. Cir. 1994)(en banc)(when the claimed             
          limitation is presented in a means-plus-function format, we                 
          interpret it as being limited to the corresponding structure                
          described in the specification and equivalents thereof in                   
          accordance with the requirements of 35 U.S.C. § 112, paragraph              
          6).                                                                         














                                          6                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007