Ex Parte SCHULZ et al - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2002-0924                                                        
          Application 08/876,529                                                      


                                    THE INVENTION                                     
               The appellants claim a method for making phosphorous                   
          pentafluoride or arsenic pentafluoride.  Claim 1 is illustrative:           
               1.   A method of preparing an inorganic pentafluoride                  
          corresponding to the formula MF5, where M represents P or As,               
          said method comprising:                                                     
               reacting a trihalide corresponding to the formula MX3, where           
          M has the meaning given above and X is chlorine or bromine, with            
          chlorine, bromine or iodine and with an excess of HF at elevated            
          pressure and a temperature between -25°C and 100°C in a pressure            
          vessel, whereby a mixture of MF5 and HX is formed; and                      
               releasing and discharging the mixture from the pressure                
          vessel as a gaseous mixture and isolating the MF5 formed.                   
                                   THE REFERENCES                                     
          Wiesboeck                  3,584,999               Jun. 15, 1971            
          Jonas (DE ‘247)1              812,247               Aug. 27, 1951           
               (German patent)                                                        
                                   THE REJECTIONS                                     
               Claims 1-4 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being               
          unpatentable over DE ‘247 in view of Wiesboeck.                             
                                       OPINION                                        
               We reverse the aforementioned rejection.  We need to address           
          only the sole independent claim, i.e., claim 1.                             


               1 Citations herein to this reference are to the English                
          translation thereof by the Ralph McElroy Translation Co.                    
          (March 1999), which is of record.                                           
                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007