Ex Parte DEVECCHIS et al - Page 7




             Appeal No. 2002-1035                                                               Page 7                
             Application No. 09/333,166                                                                               


             embedded within3 the handle 10 conveys an indication that the blade 11 is molded                         
             within the handle 10 rather than press-fitted or driven thereinto.  Thus, it is not apparent             
             to us why the formation of the handle end of the blade 11 would have provided any                        
             suggestion to one of ordinary skill in the art with regard to the formation of the tip                   
             member 12, which is to be driven into the working end of the blade 11, not molded                        
             therein.  In any event, we find nothing in the teachings of Rosenburg or Kruesi which                    
             would have led one of ordinary skill in the art to apply the teachings with regard to the                
             handle end of the blade to the tip member of Rosenburg’s screw driver.                                   
                    Kruesi’s self-insulating composite tool is made by braiding reinforcing filaments F               
             forming the tool shank 16 about the outer periphery of a mandrel 12 and the outer                        
             periphery of the tip shank 14B of a metal tip 14 followed by impregnation of the fibers                  
             with resin R and compression molding.  The tip shank 14B has a polygonal profile.                        
             While Kruesi’s tip shank could perhaps be formed with flutes having a substantial                        
             depth, we find nothing in either Kruesi or Rosenburg which would have suggested such                     
             a profile.4  The mere fact that the prior art could be so modified would not have made                   
             the modification obvious unless the prior art suggested the desirability of the                          
             modification.  See In re Mills, 916 F.2d 680, 682, 16 USPQ2d 1430, 1432 (Fed. Cir.                       
             1990); In re Gordon, 733 F.2d 900, 902, 221 USPQ 1125, 1127 (Fed. Cir. 1984).                            



                    3 The protrusions do not appear to extend longitudinally to the end of the handle.                
                    4 In fact, such a profile would appear to render more difficult the step of braiding the filaments F
             forming the tool shank 16 about the tip shank 14B as disclosed by Kruesi.                                





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007