Ex Parte CAPPS et al - Page 11
Legal Research Home >
Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences > 2003 > Ex Parte CAPPS et al - Page 11
Appeal No. 2002-1041
Application 08/866,402
claim 20 which does not require this limitation. It would have
been obvious to use a touch sensitive overlay in Volk because it
was a well known substitute for a mouse pointing system. The
rejection of claim 24 is sustained.
Claim 26
The method of claim 26 would have been obvious for the
reasons stated in connection with system claim 20. The rejection
of claim 26 is sustained.
Claim 27
The method of claim 27 would have been obvious for the
reasons stated in connection with system claim 21. The rejection
of claim 27 is sustained.
Claim 28
The method of claim 28 would have been obvious for the
reasons stated in connection with system claim 22. The rejection
of claim 28 is sustained.
Claims 29 and 30
The method of claim 29 would not have been obvious for the
reasons stated in connection with system claim 23. There is no
- 11 -
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Last modified: November 3, 2007
|
