Ex Parte GOCHANOUR - Page 2


         Appeal No. 2002-1123                                                       
         Application No. 09/110,987                                                 

         7 and 9) or withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37            
         CFR § 1.142(b) (1959) (claims 10, 13, 14, and 17).                         
              The subject matter on appeal relates to a dispenser for a             
         roll of flexible stretchable film to be used as a hand covering.           
         Further details of this appealed subject matter are recited in             
         representative claim 1 reproduced below:                                   
                   1.  A dispenser for a roll of flexible                           
              stretchable film to be used as a hand covering, the                   
              roll of film defining a central axis, and having first                
              and second surfaces, with the first surface including                 
              an applied adhesive, the dispenser comprising:                        
                   a housing to receive the roll of film;                           
                   an edge operative to separate the film drawn off                 
              the roll into individual sheets for use; and                          
                   a base member between the roll and the edge over                 
              which the film is drawn, with the first surface facing                
              outwardly, and wherein the base member defines an area                
              of at least 40 square inches to permit placement of                   
              the palmar surface of an average adult human hand                     
              thereagainst to be covered by the flexible,                           
              stretchable film.                                                     
              The examiner relies on the following prior art references             
         as evidence of unpatentability:                                            
         Stoller             3,229,875           Jan. 18, 1966                      
         Garr               4,607,774           Aug. 26, 1986                      
              Claims 3 and 8 on appeal stand rejected under the second              
         paragraph of 35 U.S.C. § 112 as indefinite.  (Examiner’s answer            
         mailed Nov. 1, 2001, paper 18, page 3.)  Further, claims 1                 
         through 3, 5, 6, and 8 on appeal stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.            


                                         2                                          


Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007