Ex Parte Adams et al - Page 1




                                   The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                       
                                          for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                                

                                                                                                          Paper No. 23              

                                    UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                       
                                                           ____________                                                             
                                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                         
                                                      AND INTERFERENCES                                                             
                                                           ____________                                                             
                                    Ex parte CARL F. ADAMS and CURTIS A. TRAMMELL                                                   
                                                           ____________                                                             
                                                       Appeal No. 2002-1234                                                         
                                                    Application No. 09/546,466                                                      
                                                           ____________                                                             
                                                    HEARD: MARCH 19, 2003                                                           
                                                           ____________                                                             
               Before HAIRSTON, BARRETT, and SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                  
               HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                               




                                                      DECISION ON APPEAL                                                            


                       This is an appeal from the final rejection of claim 15.  In an Amendment After Final (paper                  
               number 9), claim 15 was amended.                                                                                     
                       The disclosed invention relates to a means for transferring heat from an electrical coil to an               
               E-block of an disc drive actuator assembly.                                                                          








Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007