Ex Parte ADAMS - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2002-1407                                                        
          Application 09/157,995                                                      


          matter on appeal and a copy of those claims can be found in the             
          Appendix to appellant’s brief.                                              


          The prior art references of record relied upon by the                       
          examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:                              
          Marsh                         GB 2180682A         Apr. 1, 1987              
          Pickardt et al. (Pickardt) GB 2201821A            Sep. 7, 1988              
          Advertisement for “Double or Nothing” slot machine                          
          distributed by Bally Distributing Company (Bally), page 267, 1984           

          Claims 1 and 4 through 20 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.                    
          § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Bally in view of Marsh.                 


          Claims 2 and 3 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as                   
          being unpatentable over Bally in view of Pickardt.                          


          Rather than attempt to reiterate the examiner's full                        
          commentary with regard to the above-noted rejections and the                
          conflicting viewpoints advanced by the examiner and appellant               
          regarding those rejections, we make reference to the final                  
          rejection (Paper No. 12, mailed June 12, 2001) and examiner's               
          answer (Paper No. 19, mailed February 25, 2002) for the reasoning           



                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007