Appeal No. 2002-1454
Application 08/909,950
138 (Fed. Cir. 1986) and Lindemann Maschinenfabrik GMBH v.
American Hoist & Derrick Co., 730 F.2d 1452, 1458, 221 USPQ 481,
485 (Fed. Cir. 1984).
Appellants point out that each of the independent claims
recite that a HTML document “has voice application HTML tags
inserted therein, said tags providing the commands and data
required to form said voice application” (e.g., claim 1).
Appellants argue that Wise either teaches nor suggests that the
independent claim language requires that a HMTL document has
voice application tags inserted therein and the tags provide the
commands and data required to form the voice application.
Appellants argue that Wise’s documents are standard HTML
documents with no such voice tags included therein. See page 4
of Appellants’ brief.
Upon our review of Wise, we agree with Appellants that Wise
fails to teach a HTML document which has voice application HTML
tags inserted therein, said tags providing the commands and data
required to form the voice application as recited in all of
Appellants’ claims. Wise teaches that it is the object of the
invention to provide an audio information presentation for
accessing and navigating through electronic documents and
4
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007