The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today was not written for publication in a law journal
and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 19
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
Ex parte PRASAD V. UPADRASTA
Appeal No. 2002-1513
Application No. 08/829,587
ON BRIEF
Before URYNOWICZ, RUGGIERO and LEVY, Administrative Patent
Judges.
URYNOWICZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
Decision on Appeal
This appeal is from the final rejection of claims 1, 2, 4-10
and 12-19, all of the claims pending in the application.
The invention pertains to method and apparatus for bi-modal
data communication. Claim 1 is illustrative and reads as
follows:
-1–
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007