The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 18
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte EMIL VEIT-SALOMON and TOBIAS KOCH
___________
Appeal No. 2002-1548
Application No. 09/408,042
__________
ON BRIEF
__________
Before COHEN, ABRAMS, and FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent
Judges.
FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's refusal to
allow claims 1, 3 through 9, 11 through 14 and 16 through 20 as
amended subsequent to the final rejection in a paper filed July
25, 2001 (Paper No. 9). Claims 1, 3 through 9, 11 through 14 and
16 through 20 are all of the claims remaining in this
application. Claims 2, 10 and 15 have been canceled.
As noted on page 3 of the specification, appellants’
invention is directed to a car body for a streetcar, subway car
or similar vehicle and, more particularly, to such a car wherein
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007