Ex Parte HUNT et al - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2002-1555                                       Page 2           
          Application No. 09/511,572                                                  


                    26.  A gas dispersion apparatus for use in a reactor              
               comprising:                                                            
                    at least one gas source;                                          
                    at least two gas dispersion elements positioned                   
               proximate a filament array and a substrate, each said gas              
               dispersion element forming an independent discharged gas               
               zone directed at said substrate; and                                   
                    each said gas dispersion element connected to said gas            
               source by a gas feedline wherein gas flow can be                       
               independently controlled to each said gas dispersion element           
               and gas zone formed thereby.                                           

               The prior art references of record relied upon by the                  
          examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:                              
          Fujiyama et al. (Fujiyama)    4,529,474           Jul. 16, 1985             
          Anthony et al. (Anthony)      4,970,986           Nov. 20, 1990             
          Fujii et al. (Fujii)          4,980,204           Dec. 25, 1990             
          Watabe                        5,500,256           Mar. 19, 1996             
          Ni                            6,200,387           Mar. 13, 2001             
                                                  (filed Oct. 30, 1998)               
               Claims 26-29 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being             
          unpatentable over Anthony in view of Ni or Fujii.  Claims 30-33             
          stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over             
          Anthony in view of Ni or Fujii, and further in view of Fujiyama.            
          Claims 34-42 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being                  
          unpatentable over Anthony in view of Ni or Fujii and further in             
          view of Watabe.                                                             









Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007